EN
ES
Affidavits and Supporting Documents
\r\n\r\n- \r\n \t
- To read the inappropriate affidavit from Cherilyn Williams West, click here \r\n \t
- To read the inappropriate affidavit from Claudia Gayle, click here \r\n \t
- To read Cherriline Williams’s date wise Total Check here \r\n \t
- To read the inappropriate affidavit from Patricia Robinson, click here \r\n \t
- Corporate Disclosure: Click here \r\n \t
- Jonathan Bernstein inappropriate summons and complaints submitted to the federal court: Click here \r\n
![here](\"https://harryhomecare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/List-of-Parties.png\"){kind=link}
His summons and complaints should not be enforceable to the federal court because of the fact there is no violation under 29 U.S.C.A. 206, 207, 255. And without violation, the code 29 U.S.C.A. 216 (a, b, c, d) is not enforceable. Therefore, the supposed to be reverse and all the judgment that placed against Harry’s Nurses Registry and its corporate officer Mr. Harry Dorvilier should be vacated.
\r\nThe summons and complaints that Mr. Bernstein filed to the court in order to represent a lawsuit are inappropriate according to the enforcement law to the department of justice under section 2456. 29 U.S.C. 201 to 219. The principle of a lawsuit is to have valid clients and their proper consent, while Jonathan Bernstein has represented a non documented individual and without proper consent of an employment lawsuit. His affidavit here. All the procedures that he illustrated do not have any jurisdiction.
\r\n29 U.S. Code § 203 (d)
\r\n(d) “Employer” includes any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee and includes a public agency, but does not include any labor organization (other than when acting as an employer) or anyone acting in the capacity of officer or agent of such labor organization.
\r\n29 U.S.C. § 203 (g)
\r\n(g) “Employ” includes to suffer or permit to work.
\r\n29 U.S. Code § 216b. Liability for overtime work performed prior to July 20, 1949
\r\nNo employer shall be subject to any liability or punishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.] (in any action or proceeding commenced prior to or on or after January 24, 1950), on account of the failure of the said employer to pay an employee compensation for any period of overtime work performed prior to July 20, 1949, if the compensation paid prior to July 20, 1949, for such work was at least equal to the compensation which would have been payable for such work had section 7(d)(6) and (7) and section 7(g) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended [29 U.S.C. 207(d)(6), (7), (g)], been in effect at the time of such payment.
\r\n29 U.S. Code § 255.Statute of limitations
\r\n(a)if the cause of action accrues on or after May 14, 1947—may be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, and every such action shall be forever barred unless commenced within two years after the cause of action accrued, except that a cause of action arising out of a willful violation may be commenced within three years after the cause of action accrued;
\r\nClick here1 here2 to read his wrong procedures to get partial summary judgments against both defendants.
\r\nPrivate attorney Mr. Jonathan Bernstein filed a fake summons and complaints against Harry’s Nurses Registry Inc. and corporate officer Mr. Harry Dorvilier on the 7th of November 2007 without conducting audits by the Department of Labor. On 23th December 2010 (Docket 127), Federal Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis granted the Motion for Summary Judgment for Claudia Gayle awarded $7,390 in unpaid overtime and the same amount as liquidated damages, for a total of $14,780. However, on 11th September 2018 (Docket 261), Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis does not remember that he gave an order on December 23, 2010 (Docket 127) which is the main schemer.
\r\nBesides, attorney Jonathan Bernstein issued 1099 to satisfy the judgment on 09th October 2012. On 3rd January 2013, he received the money from Harry’s Nurses Account. On 29th January 2013, according to him, issued two checks to Claudia Gayle for $11,085. On 27th January 2014, he said, he sent the check (17622) for $3,695. In addition, on 19th July 2018, the judge ordered Bernstein to bring the check on camera, later judge seal the records for the public not to have access to those fake checks. Defendant Harry Dorvilier later filed a motion to Sanctions (Docket 233), Jonathan Bernstein, on 22nd September 2017, and the judge denied the motion for Sanctions that prove that the whole case is a scheme case orchestrated by a Private attorney and the court is covered for him.
", "youtube_url": "", "featured_image": "https://hnrlawlibrary.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Cherilyn-Williams-West-e1790623885292.jpg", "meta": { "images": [], "pdfs": [] } }